Option 20:

Reduce the Child Tax Credit to $1,000

Topline Estimates

Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
-<0.05%
Gross National Product (GNP)
+0.1%
Full-Time Equivalent Jobs
-5K
Wage Rate
-<0.05%
Capital Stock
-0.1%
Conventional Primary Deficit Change (10‑Yr)
-$928.1B
Dynamic Primary Deficit Change (10‑Yr)
-$901.4B
Dynamic Total Deficit Change (10‑Yr)
-$1,090.3B

Source: Tax Foundation General Equilibrium Model.

Currently, the child tax credit reduces income tax liability by a maximum of $2,200 (inflation-adjusted) for each qualifying child under age 17. It phases out by $50 for every $1,000 of adjusted gross income above $200,000 for single parents and $400,000 for married couples filing jointly. If a taxpayer’s tax liability is smaller than the value of the credit, a limited amount of the credit can be refunded, calculated as 15 percent of their income that exceeds $2,500, up to a maximum of $1,700 per child (inflation-adjusted).

This option reduces the child tax credit to $1,000 and does not inflation-adjust it going forward. The smaller credit would limit taxpayer exposure to both the phase-in and the phaseout ranges of the credit, reducing both the positive and negative work incentives created by the credit’s effects on marginal tax rates.

On a conventional basis, this option would decrease the primary deficit by $928.1 billion over the budget window. Long-run output would decrease slightly, while long-run GNP would rise by 0.1 percent as the additional revenue raised would decrease federal government borrowing and interest payments to foreigners. On a dynamic basis, the primary deficit would decrease by $901.4 billion from 2027 through 2036, $26.7 billion less than the conventional estimate. Incorporating changes in interest costs, the publicly held debt-to-GDP ratio would be lower than baseline, reaching 170.2 percent by 2056.

On average, in 2036, taxpayers would see decreases in their after-tax incomes of 0.4 percent. The top quintile of taxpayers would experience a 0.1 percent decrease, whereas the bottom quintile would experience a 1.5 percent decrease. On a long-run dynamic basis, taxpayers would see a 0.4 percent decrease on average.

Modeled Results

Note: Reform options presented within Options for Reforming America's Tax Code 3.0 illustrate the economic, revenue, and distributional tradeoffs of each tax option and are not necessarily endorsed or opposed by Tax Foundation.

Explore All Reform Options

Browse, search, and sort every reform option in the guide.

Note: Reform options presented within Options for Reforming America's Tax Code 3.0 illustrate the economic, revenue, and distributional tradeoffs of each tax option and are not necessarily endorsed or opposed by Tax Foundation.