Option 19:
Source: Tax Foundation General Equilibrium Model.
The child tax credit reduces income tax liability by a maximum of $2,200 (inflation-adjusted) for each qualifying child under age 17. It phases out by $50 for every $1,000 of adjusted gross income above $200,000 for single parents and $400,000 for married couples filing jointly. If a taxpayer’s tax liability is smaller than the value of the credit, a limited amount of the credit can be refunded, calculated as 15 percent of their income that exceeds $2,500, up to a maximum of $1,700 per child (inflation-adjusted).
This option makes the credit fully refundable, removing the phase-in with earned income and the limitation on how much is refundable. While full refundability would increase the tax benefit lower-income taxpayers receive from the credit, it would also increase marginal tax rates on earned income by removing the phase-in.
On a conventional basis, this option would increase the primary deficit by $272.4 billion over the budget window. Long-run GDP and GNP would fall by 0.1 percent. On a dynamic basis, the primary deficit would increase by $334.9 billion from 2027 through 2036, $62.5 billion more than the conventional estimate. Incorporating changes in interest costs, the publicly held debt-to-GDP ratio would be higher than baseline, reaching 177.6 percent by 2056.
On average, in 2036, taxpayers would see increases in their after-tax incomes of 0.2 percent. The top quintile of taxpayers would be unaffected, whereas the bottom quintile would experience a 2.9 percent increase. On a long-run dynamic basis, taxpayers would see a 0.1 percent increase on average.
Note: Reform options presented within Options for Reforming America's Tax Code 3.0 illustrate the economic, revenue, and distributional tradeoffs of each tax option and are not necessarily endorsed or opposed by Tax Foundation.
Browse, search, and sort every reform option in the guide.
Note: Reform options presented within Options for Reforming America's Tax Code 3.0 illustrate the economic, revenue, and distributional tradeoffs of each tax option and are not necessarily endorsed or opposed by Tax Foundation.