Option 80:

Introduce a Carbon Tax at $25 per Ton

Topline Estimates

Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
-0.2%
Gross National Product (GNP)
-0.1%
Full-Time Equivalent Jobs
-194K
Wage Rate
0.0%
Capital Stock
-0.2%
Conventional Primary Deficit Change (10‑Yr)
-$1,099.6B
Dynamic Primary Deficit Change (10‑Yr)
-$910.5B
Dynamic Total Deficit Change (10‑Yr)
-$1,108.7B

Source: Tax Foundation General Equilibrium Model.

Among economists, a tax on greenhouse gas emissions like CO2 is viewed as an ideal policy solution to address climate change, although identifying the optimal rate is subject to uncertainty.

This option imposes a tax on US greenhouse gas emissions (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and fluorinated gases), including both energy-related and non-energy-related emissions. The tax is border-adjusted, so it exempts emissions from producing exports, while including emissions from purchasing imports.

The tax rate starts at $25 per ton of CO2 equivalent greenhouse gas emissions and rises by inflation plus 1 percent per year. We assume high noncompliance rates for areas where emissions may be difficult to measure, such as methane emissions from agriculture. Like other excise taxes, a carbon tax would primarily burden labor, reducing real, after-tax wages, hours worked, and economic output. These estimates only capture the effect of a carbon tax reducing after-tax returns to labor and do not account for environmental or other benefits, nor compliance or other costs.

On a conventional basis, this option would decrease the primary deficit by $1,099.6 billion over the budget window. Long-run GDP would fall by 0.2 percent, while long-run GNP would fall by 0.1 percent. On a dynamic basis, the primary deficit would decrease by $910.5 billion from 2027 through 2036, $189.1 billion less than the conventional estimate. Incorporating changes in interest costs, the publicly held debt-to-GDP ratio would be lower than baseline, reaching 172.8 percent by 2056.

On average, in 2036, taxpayers would see decreases in their after-tax incomes of 0.5 percent. The top quintile of taxpayers and the bottom quintile of taxpayers would each experience a 0.5 percent decrease. On a long-run dynamic basis, taxpayers would see a 0.6 percent decrease on average.

Modeled Results

Note: Reform options presented within Options for Reforming America's Tax Code 3.0 illustrate the economic, revenue, and distributional tradeoffs of each tax option and are not necessarily endorsed or opposed by Tax Foundation.

Explore All Reform Options

Browse, search, and sort every reform option in the guide.

Note: Reform options presented within Options for Reforming America's Tax Code 3.0 illustrate the economic, revenue, and distributional tradeoffs of each tax option and are not necessarily endorsed or opposed by Tax Foundation.