Option 50:

Introduce a 10 Percent Value-Added Tax

Topline Estimates

Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
-2.6%
Gross National Product (GNP)
-1.1%
Full-Time Equivalent Jobs
-2.5M
Wage Rate
+0.1%
Capital Stock
-2.1%
Conventional Primary Deficit Change (10‑Yr)
-$16,291.2B
Dynamic Primary Deficit Change (10‑Yr)
-$12,959.0B
Dynamic Total Deficit Change (10‑Yr)
-$15,605.6B

Source: Tax Foundation General Equilibrium Model.

The United States is one of the few countries in the world that does not have a value-added tax (VAT). A VAT is like a sales tax in that it is designed to tax all final consumption. Typically, VATs are administered through a credit-invoice system, in which companies at every step of the supply chain charge VAT to their customers and receive a credit for VAT paid on business inputs. VATs are usually border-adjusted, meaning they tax imports but exempt exports.

This option introduces a VAT of 10 percent on a broad base, covering approximately 72 percent of US GDP. As such, even a low-rate tax could raise a significant amount of revenue. In practice, most VATs exempt certain sectors of the economy, such as non-profits and health care. A VAT with large exemptions would raise much less revenue. A VAT would reduce after-tax returns to labor. As a result, it would have a negative impact on incentives to work, reducing hours worked and total economic output.

On a conventional basis, this option would decrease the primary deficit by $16,291.2 billion over the budget window. Long-run GDP would fall by 2.6 percent, and long-run GNP by 1.1 percent. The gap between the effect on output (GDP) and income (GNP) is a result of the large change in the US budget deficit; a smaller budget deficit reduces interest payments to foreigners, which increases GNP.

On a dynamic basis, the primary deficit would decrease by $12,959.0 billion from 2027 through 2036, $3,332.2 billion less than the conventional estimate. Incorporating changes in interest costs, the publicly held debt-to-GDP ratio would be lower than baseline, reaching 71.6 percent by 2056.

On average, in 2036, taxpayers would see decreases in their after-tax incomes of 8.1 percent. The top quintile of taxpayers would experience a 7.9 percent decrease, while the bottom quintile would experience an 8.1 percent decrease. On a long-run dynamic basis, taxpayers would see a 10.1 percent decrease on average.

Modeled Results

Note: Reform options presented within Options for Reforming America's Tax Code 3.0 illustrate the economic, revenue, and distributional tradeoffs of each tax option and are not necessarily endorsed or opposed by Tax Foundation.

Explore All Reform Options

Browse, search, and sort every reform option in the guide.

Note: Reform options presented within Options for Reforming America's Tax Code 3.0 illustrate the economic, revenue, and distributional tradeoffs of each tax option and are not necessarily endorsed or opposed by Tax Foundation.